There is no gainsaying the fact that the Indians have never reconciled with the existence of Pakistan. Since its inception in 1947, New Delhi has been indulging in conspiracies galore to undo Pakistan. How can one forget the manner in which the Indian rulers masterminded, bankrolled and then trained the notorious Mukti Bhanis in the then East Pakistan in the early part of 1970 and managed severing the eastern wing of this country from Pakistan renaming it as Bangla Desh. Didn’t the leading Indian leader, Subramaniam joyously declare after the break-up of Pakistan that Indians have avenged 1000 year old enmity with the muslims?
The Indians have been trying hard since 1947 to foment trouble for us in the FATA as well as in Balochistan in cahoots with Kabul but since an overwhelming population of these two strategically important parts of this country are extremely loyal to this country they have not succeeded in the achievement of their ugly designs. Off and on we do hear Indian media airing the views of some treacherous persons who, for us fall in the category of Mir Qasims and Mir Jaffers. A case in point is one Naela Quadri Baloch who has been visiting throughout the length and breadth of India asking the Indians to militarily intervene in Balochistan the way they meddled in the affairs of the then East Pakistan back in 1971. She poses herself as president of World Baloch Women’s Forum. The Indian media has given a big coverage to her statements issued by her in India.
The very fact that New Delhi has given her Indian visa and she was encouraged to spit venom against Pakistan speaks volumes of India’s hatred against this country.
Is is a pity that our Foreign office has not been playing a pro-active role in Pakistan’s policy towards India. Experience of hindsight tells us that for the last so many years our policy towards New Delhi has been rather apologetic than aggressive. There is a need to expose vehemently in the world’s capitals activities of New Delhi aimed at destabilizing Pakistan. Obviously, the Foreign Office could only be jogged into action by the prime minister whose interest in foreign affairs can be gauged from the fact that he has not even considered it worthwhile and necessary to appoint a fully-fledged foreign minister and himself continues to hold the portfolio of the foreign minister too. The two advisers who advise him in foreign affairs are well past their prime. Both are octogenarians who simply cannot shoulder the pressing demand of their office. The prime minister is too occupied with his other umpteen engagements to spare sufficient time for foreign relations.